Appeal Trial of Husamettin Dogan: Key Witnesses Testify on Awareness of Assault

Article: Defendant's Awareness Confirmed in Pelicot Assault Appeal

In a pivotal moment during the appeal trial of Husamettin Dogan, witnesses have testified that he was fully aware that Gisele Pelicot was unconscious while he assaulted her. This testimony contradicts Dogan's claims that he believed the encounter was consensual.

Background of the Case

Gisele Pelicot, a French woman, was subjected to a series of assaults orchestrated by her ex-husband, Dominique Pelicot. Over a period of nine years, Dominique drugged Gisele and invited men to assault her while she was unconscious. The case drew international attention and led to widespread discussions on sexual violence and consent.

In December 2024, 51 men, including Dominique Pelicot, were convicted for their involvement in the assaults. Dogan was sentenced to nine years in prison but appealed the conviction, asserting that he did not intend to commit rape.

Key Testimonies

During the appeal trial in Nîmes, France, witnesses provided compelling evidence regarding Dogan's awareness of the situation. Investigator Jeremie Bosse-Platière presented video footage showing Gisele Pelicot moving slightly during the assault, prompting Dogan to pause. The footage suggests that Dogan was concerned about her waking up, indicating his awareness of her unconscious state.

Dominique Pelicot, who orchestrated the assaults, testified that he never coerced or misled Dogan. He denied that he had invited Dogan to participate in a sexual game, countering Dogan's defense.

Gisele Pelicot's Role

Gisele Pelicot, who waived her right to anonymity during the initial trial, attended the appeal proceedings in person. Her decision to publicly testify has been hailed as a courageous act that has brought attention to issues of sexual violence and the importance of consent in legal definitions.

Legal Implications

The outcome of this appeal trial could have significant implications for the legal understanding of consent and sexual assault. The case has already prompted discussions in France about potential reforms to rape laws, including clearer definitions of consent and the need for explicit acknowledgment of non-consensual acts.

Disclaimer:
This article is based on publicly available information as of October 7, 2025. Legal proceedings and interpretations may evolve, and readers are encouraged to consult official sources for the most current developments.