Hamas Rejects UN Resolution on Gaza Citing Palestinian Rights Concerns

Gaza’s Hamas authorities have rejected a new United Nations Security Council resolution that supports an international plan for Gaza, saying the proposal does not meet the political or humanitarian needs of the Palestinian people. The statement was issued on Monday after the Security Council approved a US-drafted text aimed at advancing a wider peace framework for the region.

The resolution passed with 13 votes in favor and two abstentions, with no member using a veto. It outlines the deployment of an international force in Gaza and presents a pathway toward a future Palestinian state as part of a larger peace initiative.

What Happened

The United Nations Security Council voted on a US-drafted resolution intended to support a long-term plan for peace in Gaza. The plan includes the introduction of an international security force and sets broad guidelines for political stability and reconstruction in the territory.

When It Happened

The vote took place on Monday, with the results announced shortly after. The resolution forms part of ongoing diplomatic efforts to stabilize Gaza and establish conditions for future negotiations.

Where It Happened

The voting was held at the United Nations headquarters, while the response from Hamas was issued from Gaza.

Hamas’ Response

In its official statement, Hamas rejected the resolution, saying:

• It does not meet the demands, rights and humanitarian needs of Palestinians.

• The proposed international force would amount to international trusteeship over Gaza.

• The mission outlined in the resolution includes disarmament of Palestinian groups, which the organization opposes.

The group said that all Palestinian factions and local communities reject any arrangement that limits their control over Gaza or imposes external supervision.

What the Resolution Proposes

The US-drafted resolution focuses on:

• Deployment of an international force to support stability.

• Steps toward a future Palestinian state within a broader peace plan.

• Security arrangements meant to reduce conflict and create conditions for reconstruction.

The United States described the resolution as “historic and constructive,” stating that it could support long-term peace efforts.

How Member States Voted

• 13 members voted in favor

• Russia and China abstained

• No country vetoed the resolution

The abstentions reflected concerns about implementation, long-term political implications and the need for broader regional agreement.

Expert and Regional Reactions

Policy analysts and regional experts noted that:

• The introduction of an international force in Gaza will require clear mandates, strong cooperation on the ground, and regional support to be effective.

• Progress toward a Palestinian state will depend on negotiations, security guarantees, governance arrangements, and agreement among Palestinian groups.

• The rejection by Hamas signals that internal Palestinian political consensus remains unresolved, which could affect the feasibility of any international plan.

Experts also noted that while the resolution aims to stabilize Gaza, its success will depend on coordination with all Palestinian stakeholders and broader diplomatic engagement.

The approval of the resolution marks a significant step in international diplomatic efforts, but the rejection from Hamas highlights the existing political divide. The future of the plan will depend on negotiations, regional cooperation and the willingness of all parties to engage in a long-term framework for peace.